Hitler's Willing Executioners by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen

Hilberg summarised the debates, 'by the end of 1996, it was clear that in sharp distinction from lay readers, much of the academic world had wiped Goldhagen off the map.Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 22:51:05 Bookplateleaf 0006 Boxid IA1106209 Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II City New York Donorīlogistics Edition 1. Bauer argues that 'Goldhagen's thesis does not work.' and charges '.that the anti-German bias of his book, almost a racist bias (however much he may deny it) leads nowhere.' The American historian Fritz Stern denounced the book as unscholarly and full of racist Germanophobia. The Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer claims that 'Goldhagen stumbles badly,'.

The book was a 'publishing phenomenon', achieving fame in both the United States and Germany despite being criticized by some historians, who called it ahistorical and, according to Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg, 'totally wrong about everything' and 'worthless.' Due to its alleged 'generalizing hypothesis' about Germans, it has been characterized as anti-German. Some historians have characterized its reception as an extension of the Historikerstreit, the German historiographical debate of the 1980s that sought to explain Nazi history. 'The book sparked controversy in the press and academic circles. He is also the author of Worse Than War (2009), which examines the phenomenon of genocide. Goldhagen reached international attention and broad criticism as the author of two books about the Holocaust: Hitler's Willing Executioners (1996) and A Moral Reckoning (2002). The book was a 'publis Daniel Jonah Goldhagen is a controversial American author and former associate professor of political science and social studies at Harvard University. Daniel Jonah Goldhagen is a controversial American author and former associate professor of political science and social studies at Harvard University.

Hitler's Willing Executioners by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen